OBJECTIVE of PQ for Metal Detector
To determine that the PQ for Metal Detector perform as intended by repeatedly running the system on its intended schedules and recording all relevant information and data. Results must demonstrate that performance consistently meets pre-determined specifications under normal condition, and where appropriate the worst case situations
TABLE OF CONTENT
| PARTICULARS | PAGE NO. |
| Table of contents | |
| Objective | |
| Scope | |
| Re-Qualification Schedule | |
| Location of equipment | |
| Validation team & Responsibility | |
| Pre-approval of documents | |
| Scope of supply | |
| Brief Process Description | |
| Re-Performance Qualification Procedure | |
| Performance Verification | |
| Re-Performance Qualification Report | |
| References | |
| Result | |
| Deviation | |
| Conclusion | |
| Recommendations | |
| Attachments | |
| Post approval of document |
SCOPE
To be performed after installation, modification or relocation and for the performance at appropriate interval or as per re-qualification planner.
Performance of the sifter machine shall be documented for future reference.
Assure that the metal detector machine performance is adequate to support the process for which the system is intended
RE-QUALIFICATION SCHEDULE
Frequency
Performance check of the machine should be qualify after every 5 years ±2 months and as per requirement.
LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT
The location of the equipment is in compression in manufacturing section.
| S. No. | Name of Equipment | ID No. | Room Name |
| 1 | Metal detector | Compression |
VALIDATION TEAM AND RESPONSIBILITY
| Department | Responsibility |
| Production | Preparation of protocol and compilation of report. Review of protocol and report. Execution of Re-Qualification activities as per the protocol. Responsible for the compliance of Re-qualification data |
| Engineering | Review of protocol and report. To assist user/concerned department during Re- qualification activity |
| Quality Control | Review of protocol and report. Responsible for analysis of samples & evaluations of the test results. |
| Quality Assurance | Review, approval and certification of the protocol / reports. Execution & approved of re-qualification activities as per the protocol & certification after successful re-qualification of the equipment. |
PRE APPROVAL OF DOCUMENTS
Prepared by
| Designation | Name | Date | Signature |
| Executive/Officer Production |
Checked By
| Designation | Name | Date | Signature |
| Head Engineering | |||
| Head Production | |||
| Head Quality Control |
Approved by
| Designation | Name | Date | Signature |
| Head QA |
Scope of Supply:
| Description | Specification |
| Model | GMP Model |
| External dimension:- (all in mm) | |
| Accessories | Safety cover |
| Adjustable shaft | |
| Control system | 220 volts, single phase power supply |
PQ for Metal Detector Brief Process Description:
Metal detector is an instrument that detects the nearby presence of metal. Metal detectors are useful for finding metal objects on the surface, underground, and under water. A metal detector consists of a control box, an adjustable shaft, and a variable-shaped pickup coil. Metal detectors work on the principle of transmitting a magnetic field and analyzing a return signal from the target and environment. The transmitted magnetic field varies in time, usually at rates of fairly high-pitched audio signals.
Metal detectors are used in food and pharmaceutical industries to detect metal contamination in products or packets. The metal contamination may occur in food and pharmaceutical products due the presence of metallic pieces or components (viz., fasteners, pins, buds, eroded or corroded metallic parts etc.) in ferrous, non-ferrous, or stainless-steel materials. Detection of such metal contamination is important and in this detection process, high accuracy and reliability are desirable. Thus, a metal detector plays an important role in ensuring product safety. In pharmaceutical industry there is a possibility that the products get contaminated by metallic parts either magnetic or non-magnetic. This is due to metal-object contamination (ingredient contamination, mixing-process errors and machinery failures) and due to the use of various process equipment viz. reactors, agitated and storage vessels, classifiers, dryers, pumps, valves, pipes etc. in the synthesis, processing and storage and most of these equipment, pipes, valves and pumps are made up of metals.
In many pharmaceutical processing, unsaturated organic compounds that contain double and or triple bonds need to be hydrogenated. Platinum black, palladium black, copper metal, copper oxide, nickel oxide, aluminum and other materials have subsequently been developed as hydrogenation catalysts. Abrasive materials can wear mill parts and screens. In these operations, there a probability always exists the products get contaminated with various metallic components. The final food and pharmaceutical products must free from metal contamination as per GMP standards.
- Machine rated for continuous operation
- Higher output with process uniformity.
- All contact parts of SS 316 AISI.
- All contact parts can easily be dismantled and cleaned for change of product.
- Technical Details:
- Outside controls
- Design as per stringent cGMP requirements.
- All Contact parts of AISI Stainless Steel 316 Quality
- All Non contact parts of AISI Stainless Steel 304 Quality
- Silicon Food Grade seal/ gasket
- Easy mobility
- Easy to clean all contact parts
PQ for Metal Detector PROCEDURE
- The action of repeating the qualification or reconfirming that process, product or equipment is suitable for a particular position or task.
- Availability of product for operates with load to be checked.
- The power supply and connected utility was checked before starting re-performance qualification.
- The operating functions of switches and buttons were checked before executing the activity.
PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION
- Objective of this performance verification is to provide documented evidence that equipment perform as per respective and up to its operating & performance range
Standard Operating Parameters Verification
- Objective of this verification is to provide documented evidence that equipment perform satisfactory as per its standard operating procedure.
Cleaning check:
| Check points | Observation | Checked By (Sign & Date) |
| Check the cleanliness of the sifter hopper | ||
| Check the cleanliness of sifter ring, sieves and its gasket | ||
| Check cleanliness of the sifter body and its wheels | ||
| Check the cleanliness of gasket and clamp | ||
| Check the cleanliness of discharge chute | ||
| Check the cleanliness of sieve |
Safety precaution while sifting of material:-
- Mask and gloves should be wearing during sifting.
Performance check of the machine/equipment:-
| Test | Acceptance Criteria | Observations | Done By Sign/Date | Checked By Sign/Date |
| Check the machine for proper placement. | Machine should be place in adequate space & there should be enough space | |||
| Check the machine for proper vibration for sieving of material. | Machine vibration should be adequate to sieve the material. | |||
| Check the uniformity of material on the sieve. | Material should cover all the corners & center on the sieve & pass through all the face area of the sieve. | |||
| Check the proper sealing of the clamp with gasket. | Material should not be leak from the clamp sides during operation. |
Test Method:
Operate the equipment as per Standard Operating Procedure SOP no. APD/PRD/002 for Operation & Cleaning of Vibro sifter machine and record the performance of the machine.
Testing procedure:
For performance check of the sifter machine, take raw material and pass the material from the minimum, medium & maximum size of sifter sieve.
- Take raw material quantity 1 kg of Lactose monohydrate and open the clamp set of the sifter. Sieve of 40# size to be fix in the sifter after fixing of sieve assemble the clamp set and switch on the sifter. Put the material in the hopper using scoop & collect the passed material in labeled poly bag. Weigh the collected material & calculate in the calculation sheet given below.
Testing for average/medium size of granule:-
- Take raw material quantity 1 kg of MCCP 102 and open the clamp set of the sifter. Sieve of 60# size to be fix in the sifter after fixing of sieve assemble the clamp set and switch on the sifter. Put the material in the hopper using scoop & collect the passed material in labeled poly bag. Weigh the collected material & calculate in the calculation sheet given below.
Testing for maximum size of granule:-
- Take raw material quantity 1 kg of talcum powder and open the clamp set of the sifter. Sieve of 100# size to be fix in the sifter after fixing of sieve assemble the clamp set and switch on the sifter. Put the material in the hopper using scoop & collect the passed material in labeled poly bag. Weigh the collected material & calculate in the calculation sheet given below.
Calculation sheet: – For sieving of minimum, medium & maximum size of mesh
Size of sieve:-
Total weight of sample/material to be pass through the sieve:-
Result (%) = Weight after the sample/material passed through the sieve X 100
Total weight of sample/material to be pass through the sieve
- Record the preventive maintenance status of the machine/equipment.
| Equipment Name | I.D. No. | Section | Detail of Preventive Maintenance | |
| Done on | Due on | |||
Acceptance Criteria:
- Equipment/ Machine shall be operating as defined in the standard operating procedure, if differ then record deviation & check the performance of machine.
- Difference of the product should not be less than 2% of the total weight of material to be passed through the sieve.
- Operation shall be smooth and there should not be any abnormal sound/ noise.
PQ for Metal Detector REPORT:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
REFERENCES:
SOP No.
In-house
RESULT:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Checked By (Sign & date):________________
DEVIATION/CHANGE CONTROL
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Checked By (Sign & date):________________
CONCLUSION: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Written By (Sign & date):________________
RECOMMENDATIONS
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Written By (Sign & date):________________
POST APPROVAL OF DOCUMENTS
Prepared by
| Designation | Name | Date | Signature |
| Executive/Officer Production |
Checked By
| Designation | Name | Date | Signature |
| Head Engineering | |||
| Head Production | |||
| Head Quality Control |
Approved by
| Designation | Name | Date | Signature |
| Head QA |